PHP Friends Winter Special is live! Let the hunger games begin :)

YmpkerYmpker OGContent Writer
edited December 2019 in General

Go ahead and buy it. Then post benchmarks :D

Order: Click

Thanked by (1)Amitz

Comments

  • yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent Writer

    @tgl said:
    yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

    Find a provider that matches the specs? I'd reckon there aren't that many reputable ones :)

  • @Ympker said:

    @tgl said:
    yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

    Find a provider that matches the specs? I'd reckon there aren't that many reputable ones :)

    For the price, they are likely to be unmatched this Christmas, especially if you are outside Europe and don't need to pay VAT

    Thanked by (1)Ympker

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent Writer

    @poisson said:

    @Ympker said:

    @tgl said:
    yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

    Find a provider that matches the specs? I'd reckon there aren't that many reputable ones :)

    For the price, they are likely to be unmatched this Christmas, especially if you are outside Europe and don't need to pay VAT

    I especially like the 4 cores. Usually Netcup throws something with like XX RAM at you but only like 1-2 cores.

  • Daaang nice one. I still got the 2 cores 10gb ram 40gb ssd for 18€/3m

    Sooo tempting. Also it will likely have nested virtualisation again so you can easily make 3-4 smaller vps. Also interesting for reseller to offer nat server.

    I bet it's gone until I have decided ?

    Thanked by (1)Ympker
  • @Ympker said:

    @poisson said:

    @Ympker said:

    @tgl said:
    yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

    Find a provider that matches the specs? I'd reckon there aren't that many reputable ones :)

    For the price, they are likely to be unmatched this Christmas, especially if you are outside Europe and don't need to pay VAT

    I especially like the 4 cores. Usually Netcup throws something with like XX RAM at you but only like 1-2 cores.

    The VAT rebate is 20 percent, right?

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • time will tell

  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent Writer

    @poisson said:

    @Ympker said:

    @poisson said:

    @Ympker said:

    @tgl said:
    yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

    Find a provider that matches the specs? I'd reckon there aren't that many reputable ones :)

    For the price, they are likely to be unmatched this Christmas, especially if you are outside Europe and don't need to pay VAT

    I especially like the 4 cores. Usually Netcup throws something with like XX RAM at you but only like 1-2 cores.

    The VAT rebate is 20 percent, right?

    19%

  • @Ympker said:

    @poisson said:

    @Ympker said:

    @poisson said:

    @Ympker said:

    @tgl said:
    yeah, he said he will release it, but its a little ex-Pensive, i dont think it will be a success

    Find a provider that matches the specs? I'd reckon there aren't that many reputable ones :)

    For the price, they are likely to be unmatched this Christmas, especially if you are outside Europe and don't need to pay VAT

    I especially like the 4 cores. Usually Netcup throws something with like XX RAM at you but only like 1-2 cores.

    The VAT rebate is 20 percent, right?

    19%

    Based on today's exchange rate, without VAT it is about 7.52 USD per month. Crazy pricing!

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • iandkiandk Hosting ProviderOG

    Does anyone know if it’s possible to run small IPv6 only KVMs on it?
    Should be possible with ndppd, right?

    AMD EPYC / NVMe / 10GBPs KVM in Frankfurt - https://v6node.com
    Looking for an unbeatable AMD EPYC Baremetal Server in Frankfurt? Drop me a PM

  • This is a very good deal. I really don’t need it (I keep telling myself I’m happy with the Schnupperspecial) but if you do: go go go. You won’t be disappointed.

    Thanked by (1)Ympker
  • Yeah, it's a great deal, but I've decided that I can't buy any further VPSes in 2019 =)

    (Not to mention that I got their BF special!)

    "A single swap file or partition may be up to 128 MB in size. [...] [I]f you need 256 MB of swap, you can create two 128-MB swap partitions." (M. Welsh & L. Kaufman, Running Linux, 2e, 1996, p. 49)

  • They don't appear to be dedicated cores though.

  • @rchurch said:
    They don't appear to be dedicated cores though.

    They aren’t. Other specials (before BF) were, but this runs on other hardware (so I’ve been told).

    Thanked by (1)rchurch
  • @rchurch said:
    They don't appear to be dedicated cores though.

    In this respect, like their BF special

    Thanked by (1)rchurch

    "A single swap file or partition may be up to 128 MB in size. [...] [I]f you need 256 MB of swap, you can create two 128-MB swap partitions." (M. Welsh & L. Kaufman, Running Linux, 2e, 1996, p. 49)

  • Are 4 shared cores better than 2 dedicated cores?

    I still have one with higher specs but 2 dedicated cores with them.

  • @rchurch said:
    Are 4 shared cores better than 2 dedicated cores?

    On average, probably yes, but this may not be the case at any given moment, depending on what one's neighbors are doing at that moment (but I suspect that PHP-Friends will keep an eye out for CPU abusers)

    I still have one with higher specs but 2 dedicated cores with them.

    Two dedicated cores are probably a safer bet than four shared cores

    Thanked by (3)debaser rchurch cybertech

    "A single swap file or partition may be up to 128 MB in size. [...] [I]f you need 256 MB of swap, you can create two 128-MB swap partitions." (M. Welsh & L. Kaufman, Running Linux, 2e, 1996, p. 49)

  • @rchurch said:
    Are 4 shared cores better than 2 dedicated cores?

    I still have one with higher specs but 2 dedicated cores with them.

    I have data where 3 dedicated cores consistently performs worse than 2 fair share cores on multi-core Geekbench. Couple of possible reasons:

    1. The amount of fixed CPU time allocated to the dedicated cores can vary so even if dedicated, it may not perform very well depending how much is allocated.
    2. My 2 core has a better host node CPU than the 3 core.
    3. The 2 core host node is very well-managed such that whenever I need full performance I get maximum CPU time on those cores.

    Therefore it all depends on how the host node is managed. I say the secret sauce is to know the provider and how they manage. I am a lot happier with my 2 shared cores than 3 dedicated cores.

    Of course, it is not easy to get information on how hosts set up their host nodes and balance them. You need to learn by trying and also from asking around. I don't know about CPU shared cores with PHP-Friends because I don't have a service with them to test for an extended period. I have some in testing now for about a week plus and that is why I can tell you that dedicated cores may not mean much.

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • @poisson said:

    @rchurch said:
    Are 4 shared cores better than 2 dedicated cores?

    I still have one with higher specs but 2 dedicated cores with them.

    I have data where 3 dedicated cores consistently performs worse than 2 fair share cores on multi-core Geekbench. Couple of possible reasons:

    1. The amount of fixed CPU time allocated to the dedicated cores can vary so even if dedicated, it may not perform very well depending how much is allocated.
    2. My 2 core has a better host node CPU than the 3 core.
    3. The 2 core host node is very well-managed such that whenever I need full performance I get maximum CPU time on those cores.

    Therefore it all depends on how the host node is managed. I say the secret sauce is to know the provider and how they manage. I am a lot happier with my 2 shared cores than 3 dedicated cores.

    Of course, it is not easy to get information on how hosts set up their host nodes and balance them. You need to learn by trying and also from asking around. I don't know about CPU shared cores with PHP-Friends because I don't have a service with them to test for an extended period. I have some in testing now for about a week plus and that is why I can tell you that dedicated cores may not mean much.

    Is it the same provider in the case of the two instances that you describe above?

    In any case, your points are well-taken: in principle, there are a number of variables that play a role.

    In my answer above, I was implicitly assumIng the same provider and comparable nodes, the main factor of variation being potentially (very) active neighbors at different times.

    Thanked by (1)rchurch

    "A single swap file or partition may be up to 128 MB in size. [...] [I]f you need 256 MB of swap, you can create two 128-MB swap partitions." (M. Welsh & L. Kaufman, Running Linux, 2e, 1996, p. 49)

  • @angstrom said:
    Is it the same provider in the case of the two instances that you describe above?

    In any case, your points are well-taken: in principle, there are a number of variables that play a role.

    In my answer above, I was implicitly assumIng the same provider and comparable nodes, the main factor of variation being potentially (very) active neighbors at different times.

    Not the same provider. But your answer makes much sense considering your assumptions.

    I guess the bottom line is basically go with a good provider. In that case, shared CPU is great, but dedicated will be greater. :)

    Thanked by (2)angstrom rchurch

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • No benchmarks, but the value based on assessment of specs is pretty good: https://lowendboxes.review/php-friends-winterspecial-vserver-ssd-2019/

    This is a quite future-proof VPS with that RAM and storage.

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • I recommend PHPFriends, running 3 instances for last 1+ years, they are rock solid.

    Thanked by (2)vyas poisson
  • The Network, Storage space and RAM are excellent for the price. However, the processor kind of sucks @2.10GHz, as their older offerings have had better clock speed of at-least 2.60GHz in the past.

    TL;DR- @seriesn has raised the bar with his ryzen offerings.

    Benchmark #1 - (YABS)

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2019-10-08                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Dec 22 04:27:37 CET 2019
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2100.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 9.8G
    Swap       : 0B
    Disk       : 158G
    
    Disk Speed Tests:
    ---------------------------------
           | Test 1      | Test 2      | Test 3      | Avg
           |             |             |             |
    Write  | 171.00 MB/s | 175.00 MB/s | 175.00 MB/s | 173.67 MB/s
    Read   | 509.20 MB/s | 532.06 MB/s | 527.29 MB/s | 522.85 MB/s
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                              |                           |                 |
    Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 931 Mbits/sec   | 865 Mbits/sec
    Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | 943 Mbits/sec   | 382 Mbits/sec
    Severius                  | The Netherlands (10G)     | 932 Mbits/sec   | 405 Mbits/sec
    Worldstream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | 928 Mbits/sec   | 796 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 936 Mbits/sec   | 729 Mbits/sec
    Biznet                    | Bogor, Indonesia (1G)     | busy            | busy
    Hostkey                   | Moscow, RU (1G)           | 933 Mbits/sec   | 830 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online           | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 220 Mbits/sec   | 99.7 Mbits/sec
    Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 818 Mbits/sec   | 139 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 825 Mbits/sec   | busy
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                              |                           |                 |
    Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 931 Mbits/sec   | 880 Mbits/sec
    Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | 927 Mbits/sec   | 494 Mbits/sec
    Severius                  | The Netherlands (10G)     | 932 Mbits/sec   | 389 Mbits/sec
    Worldstream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | 926 Mbits/sec   | 773 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 935 Mbits/sec   | 699 Mbits/sec
    Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 823 Mbits/sec   | 138 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 789 Mbits/sec   | busy
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1995
    Multi Core      | 5690
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15061353
    

    Benchmark #2 - (Bench Monster)

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Region: Global  https://bench.monster v.1.4.8 2019-12-12
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Global
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : Debian GNU/Linux 9 (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 4.9.0-11-amd64
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
     CPU Cores    : 4 @ 2100.000 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.07, 0.34, 0.22
     Total Space  : 158G (1.2G ~1% used)
     Total RAM    : 70 MB / 10003 MB (237 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 0 MB / 0 MB
     Uptime       : 0 days 0:14
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS44066, First Colo GmbH
     Organization : PHP Friends
     Location     : Frankfurt am Main, Germany / DE
     Region       : Hesse
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 2196  (FAIR)
       Multi Core : 5945
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     :  71.2 MB/s
       sha256     : 121 MB/s
       md5sum     : 348 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 1452.3 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 4096.0 MB/s
    
     Disk Speed:
       1st run    : 593 MB/s
       2nd run    : 588 MB/s
       3rd run    : 564 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 581.7 MB/s
    
     ## Global Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  644.67 Mbit/s    315.41 Mbit/s    5.626 ms
     USA, New York (AT&T)           171.79 Mbit/s    98.14 Mbit/s     87.675 ms
     USA, Chicago (Windstream)      71.44 Mbit/s     61.42 Mbit/s    106.604 ms
     USA, Dallas (Frontier)         153.90 Mbit/s    58.96 Mbit/s    133.767 ms
     USA, Miami (Frontier)          176.95 Mbit/s    82.42 Mbit/s    112.605 ms
     USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum)    105.89 Mbit/s    98.36 Mbit/s    147.822 ms
     UK, London (Community Fibre)   710.71 Mbit/s    111.41 Mbit/s    15.927 ms
     France, Lyon (SFR)             630.97 Mbit/s    136.01 Mbit/s    15.147 ms
     Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET)      671.08 Mbit/s    315.16 Mbit/s    13.754 ms
     Spain, Madrid (MasMovil)       511.17 Mbit/s    84.87 Mbit/s     25.004 ms
     Italy, Rome (Unidata)          578.98 Mbit/s    272.33 Mbit/s    22.523 ms
     Russia, Moscow (MTS)           220.21 Mbit/s    618.52 Mbit/s    36.747 ms
     Israel, Haifa (013Netvision)   89.02 Mbit/s     175.31 Mbit/s    53.591 ms
     Singapore (FirstMedia)         57.45 Mbit/s     31.21 Mbit/s    258.234 ms
     Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)     31.77 Mbit/s     32.00 Mbit/s    250.089 ms
     Australia, Sydney (Yes Optus)  17.06 Mbit/s     19.70 Mbit/s    302.822 ms
     RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas)     90.45 Mbit/s     144.45 Mbit/s   198.156 ms
     Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare)     18.54 Mbit/s     162.82 Mbit/s   187.896 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 10 min 13 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-12-22 03:50:51 GMT
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - http://www.speedtest.net/result/8876985422.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15061365
    

    Benchmark #3 - (ServerBench)

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
    Number of cores      : 4
    CPU frequency        : 2100.000 MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 10003 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime        : 0days, 0:26:54
    Load average         : 0.09, 0.39, 0.43
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.9.0-11-amd64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         62.6MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP                108.61.201.151          8.83MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               176.96.136.20
    DO, Bangalore, IN               139.59.80.215           4.66MB/s
    Softlayer, Chennai, IN          169.38.65.84            4.26MB/s
    Vultr, Singapore, SG            45.32.100.168           13.7MB/s
    DO, Singapore, SG               159.89.192.182          3.17MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            3.31MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           7.58MB/s
    Leaseweb, Singapore, SG         103.254.153.18          14.4MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          6.09MB/s
    Leaseweb, HongKong, CN          43.249.36.49            4.70MB/s
    Vultr, Sydney, AUS              108.61.212.117          7.06MB/s
    Softlayer, Sydney, AUS          168.1.1.212             2.46MB/s
    Softlayer, Melbourne, AUS       168.1.65.244            5.04MB/s
    Tele2, Gothenberg, SE           90.130.74.151           4.28MB/s
    Tele2, Kista, SE                90.130.74.149           53.6MB/s
    Softlayer, Milan, IT            159.122.128.84          19.1MB/s
    Prometeus, Milan, IT            37.247.53.10            31.6MB/s
    Tele2, Riga, LV                 90.130.74.113           54.4MB/s
    Tele2, Vilnius, LT              90.130.74.117           22.9MB/s
    Server.LU, Luxembourg, LU       94.242.192.2            47.7MB/s
    Tele2, Frankfurt, DE            90.130.74.155           86.5MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE            108.61.210.117          82.9MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           75.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            25.5MB/s
    Leaseweb, Frankfurt, DE         37.58.58.140            1.16MB/s
    DO, Frankfurt, DE               46.101.218.147          89.5MB/s
    Vultr, Paris, FR                108.61.209.127          58.0MB/s
    OVH, Gravelines, FR             5.196.90.200            20.5MB/s
    OVH, Strasbourg, FR             5.135.128.81            33.8MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR                188.165.12.106          18.8MB/s
    Online.Net, Paris, FR           62.210.18.40            26.9MB/s
    Tele2, Amsterdam, NL            90.130.74.153           89.2MB/s
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL            108.61.198.102          81.9MB/s
    DO 2, Amsterdam, NL             188.226.175.227         70.8MB/s
    DO 3, Amsterdam, NL             178.62.216.76           40.1MB/s
    Leaseweb, Amsterdam, NL         5.79.108.33             32.3MB/s
    i3d, Amsterdam, NL              213.163.76.135          26.3MB/s
    Vultr, London, UK               108.61.196.101          71.6MB/s
    DO, London, UK                  46.101.44.214           20.9MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           17.2MB/s
    Softlayer, London, UK           5.10.97.132             76.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX           169.57.4.116            3.01MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR           169.57.128.148          3.03MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, USA                  165.227.194.167         3.48MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, USA                  192.241.184.88          4.56MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, USA                  174.138.51.137          4.68MB/s
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA          108.61.149.182          8.56MB/s
    Linode, Newark, USA             50.116.57.237           17.1MB/s
    Vultr, Illinois, USA            107.191.51.12           24.4MB/s
    Vultr, Atlanta, USA             108.61.193.166          21.5MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, USA            50.116.39.117           2.89MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, USA               104.156.244.232         21.3MB/s
    Vultr, Washington, USA          108.61.194.105          16.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, USA         67.228.112.250          10.9MB/s
    Leaseweb, Washington, USA       207.244.94.80           6.16MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, USA              108.61.224.175          19.4MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, USA             50.116.25.154           3.92MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, USA          173.192.68.18           11.1MB/s
    Leaseweb, Dallas, USA           209.58.153.1            6.38MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA         108.61.219.200          16.2MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA          165.227.29.84           4.00MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA          107.170.223.15          14.4MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, USA            50.116.14.9             3.94MB/s
    Leaseweb, San Francisco, USA    209.58.135.187          4.13MB/s
    DO, Toronto, CA                 159.203.57.38           3.64MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA            192.99.19.165           2.90MB/s
    EastLink, Canada, CA            24.222.0.194            2.45MB/s
    Softlayer, Montreal, CA         169.54.124.180          6.42MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run) : 179 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 494 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 562 MB/s
    Average I/O speed  : 411.667 MB/s
    
    Thanked by (1)poisson
  • @K4Y5 said:
    The Network, Storage space and RAM are excellent for the price. However, the processor kind of sucks @2.10GHz, as their older offerings have had better clock speed of at-least 2.60GHz in the past.

    TL;DR- @seriesn has raised the bar with his ryzen offerings.

    Benchmark #1 - (YABS)

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2019-10-08                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Dec 22 04:27:37 CET 2019
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2100.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 9.8G
    Swap       : 0B
    Disk       : 158G
    
    Disk Speed Tests:
    ---------------------------------
           | Test 1      | Test 2      | Test 3      | Avg
           |             |             |             |
    Write  | 171.00 MB/s | 175.00 MB/s | 175.00 MB/s | 173.67 MB/s
    Read   | 509.20 MB/s | 532.06 MB/s | 527.29 MB/s | 522.85 MB/s
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                              |                           |                 |
    Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 931 Mbits/sec   | 865 Mbits/sec
    Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | 943 Mbits/sec   | 382 Mbits/sec
    Severius                  | The Netherlands (10G)     | 932 Mbits/sec   | 405 Mbits/sec
    Worldstream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | 928 Mbits/sec   | 796 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 936 Mbits/sec   | 729 Mbits/sec
    Biznet                    | Bogor, Indonesia (1G)     | busy            | busy
    Hostkey                   | Moscow, RU (1G)           | 933 Mbits/sec   | 830 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online           | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 220 Mbits/sec   | 99.7 Mbits/sec
    Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 818 Mbits/sec   | 139 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 825 Mbits/sec   | busy
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider                  | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                              |                           |                 |
    Bouygues Telecom          | Paris, FR (10G)           | 931 Mbits/sec   | 880 Mbits/sec
    Online.net                | Paris, FR (10G)           | 927 Mbits/sec   | 494 Mbits/sec
    Severius                  | The Netherlands (10G)     | 932 Mbits/sec   | 389 Mbits/sec
    Worldstream               | The Netherlands (10G)     | 926 Mbits/sec   | 773 Mbits/sec
    wilhelm.tel               | Hamburg, DE (10G)         | 935 Mbits/sec   | 699 Mbits/sec
    Airstream Communications  | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G)  | 823 Mbits/sec   | 138 Mbits/sec
    Hurricane Electric        | Fremont, CA, US (10G)     | 789 Mbits/sec   | busy
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1995
    Multi Core      | 5690
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15061353
    

    Benchmark #2 - (Bench Monster)

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Region: Global  https://bench.monster v.1.4.8 2019-12-12
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Global
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : Debian GNU/Linux 9 (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 4.9.0-11-amd64
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
     CPU Cores    : 4 @ 2100.000 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.07, 0.34, 0.22
     Total Space  : 158G (1.2G ~1% used)
     Total RAM    : 70 MB / 10003 MB (237 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 0 MB / 0 MB
     Uptime       : 0 days 0:14
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS44066, First Colo GmbH
     Organization : PHP Friends
     Location     : Frankfurt am Main, Germany / DE
     Region       : Hesse
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 2196  (FAIR)
       Multi Core : 5945
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     :  71.2 MB/s
       sha256     : 121 MB/s
       md5sum     : 348 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 1452.3 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 4096.0 MB/s
    
     Disk Speed:
       1st run    : 593 MB/s
       2nd run    : 588 MB/s
       3rd run    : 564 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 581.7 MB/s
    
     ## Global Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  644.67 Mbit/s    315.41 Mbit/s    5.626 ms
     USA, New York (AT&T)           171.79 Mbit/s    98.14 Mbit/s     87.675 ms
     USA, Chicago (Windstream)      71.44 Mbit/s     61.42 Mbit/s    106.604 ms
     USA, Dallas (Frontier)         153.90 Mbit/s    58.96 Mbit/s    133.767 ms
     USA, Miami (Frontier)          176.95 Mbit/s    82.42 Mbit/s    112.605 ms
     USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum)    105.89 Mbit/s    98.36 Mbit/s    147.822 ms
     UK, London (Community Fibre)   710.71 Mbit/s    111.41 Mbit/s    15.927 ms
     France, Lyon (SFR)             630.97 Mbit/s    136.01 Mbit/s    15.147 ms
     Germany, Berlin (DNS:NET)      671.08 Mbit/s    315.16 Mbit/s    13.754 ms
     Spain, Madrid (MasMovil)       511.17 Mbit/s    84.87 Mbit/s     25.004 ms
     Italy, Rome (Unidata)          578.98 Mbit/s    272.33 Mbit/s    22.523 ms
     Russia, Moscow (MTS)           220.21 Mbit/s    618.52 Mbit/s    36.747 ms
     Israel, Haifa (013Netvision)   89.02 Mbit/s     175.31 Mbit/s    53.591 ms
     Singapore (FirstMedia)         57.45 Mbit/s     31.21 Mbit/s    258.234 ms
     Japan, Tsukuba (SoftEther)     31.77 Mbit/s     32.00 Mbit/s    250.089 ms
     Australia, Sydney (Yes Optus)  17.06 Mbit/s     19.70 Mbit/s    302.822 ms
     RSA, Randburg (Cool Ideas)     90.45 Mbit/s     144.45 Mbit/s   198.156 ms
     Brazil, Sao Paulo (Criare)     18.54 Mbit/s     162.82 Mbit/s   187.896 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 10 min 13 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-12-22 03:50:51 GMT
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - http://www.speedtest.net/result/8876985422.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15061365
    

    Benchmark #3 - (ServerBench)

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
    Number of cores      : 4
    CPU frequency        : 2100.000 MHz
    Total amount of ram  : 10003 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime        : 0days, 0:26:54
    Load average         : 0.09, 0.39, 0.43
    OS                   : Debian GNU/Linux 9
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.9.0-11-amd64
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         62.6MB/s
    Vultr, Tokyo, JP                108.61.201.151          8.83MB/s
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               176.96.136.20
    DO, Bangalore, IN               139.59.80.215           4.66MB/s
    Softlayer, Chennai, IN          169.38.65.84            4.26MB/s
    Vultr, Singapore, SG            45.32.100.168           13.7MB/s
    DO, Singapore, SG               159.89.192.182          3.17MB/s
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            3.31MB/s
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           7.58MB/s
    Leaseweb, Singapore, SG         103.254.153.18          14.4MB/s
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          6.09MB/s
    Leaseweb, HongKong, CN          43.249.36.49            4.70MB/s
    Vultr, Sydney, AUS              108.61.212.117          7.06MB/s
    Softlayer, Sydney, AUS          168.1.1.212             2.46MB/s
    Softlayer, Melbourne, AUS       168.1.65.244            5.04MB/s
    Tele2, Gothenberg, SE           90.130.74.151           4.28MB/s
    Tele2, Kista, SE                90.130.74.149           53.6MB/s
    Softlayer, Milan, IT            159.122.128.84          19.1MB/s
    Prometeus, Milan, IT            37.247.53.10            31.6MB/s
    Tele2, Riga, LV                 90.130.74.113           54.4MB/s
    Tele2, Vilnius, LT              90.130.74.117           22.9MB/s
    Server.LU, Luxembourg, LU       94.242.192.2            47.7MB/s
    Tele2, Frankfurt, DE            90.130.74.155           86.5MB/s
    Vultr, Frankfurt, DE            108.61.210.117          82.9MB/s
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           75.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            25.5MB/s
    Leaseweb, Frankfurt, DE         37.58.58.140            1.16MB/s
    DO, Frankfurt, DE               46.101.218.147          89.5MB/s
    Vultr, Paris, FR                108.61.209.127          58.0MB/s
    OVH, Gravelines, FR             5.196.90.200            20.5MB/s
    OVH, Strasbourg, FR             5.135.128.81            33.8MB/s
    OVH, Roubaix, FR                188.165.12.106          18.8MB/s
    Online.Net, Paris, FR           62.210.18.40            26.9MB/s
    Tele2, Amsterdam, NL            90.130.74.153           89.2MB/s
    Vultr, Amsterdam, NL            108.61.198.102          81.9MB/s
    DO 2, Amsterdam, NL             188.226.175.227         70.8MB/s
    DO 3, Amsterdam, NL             178.62.216.76           40.1MB/s
    Leaseweb, Amsterdam, NL         5.79.108.33             32.3MB/s
    i3d, Amsterdam, NL              213.163.76.135          26.3MB/s
    Vultr, London, UK               108.61.196.101          71.6MB/s
    DO, London, UK                  46.101.44.214           20.9MB/s
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           17.2MB/s
    Softlayer, London, UK           5.10.97.132             76.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Mexico, MX           169.57.4.116            3.01MB/s
    Softlayer, Brazil, BR           169.57.128.148          3.03MB/s
    DO 1, NYC, USA                  165.227.194.167         3.48MB/s
    DO 2, NYC, USA                  192.241.184.88          4.56MB/s
    DO 3, NYC, USA                  174.138.51.137          4.68MB/s
    Vultr, New Jersey, USA          108.61.149.182          8.56MB/s
    Linode, Newark, USA             50.116.57.237           17.1MB/s
    Vultr, Illinois, USA            107.191.51.12           24.4MB/s
    Vultr, Atlanta, USA             108.61.193.166          21.5MB/s
    Linode, Atlanta, USA            50.116.39.117           2.89MB/s
    Vultr, Miami, USA               104.156.244.232         21.3MB/s
    Vultr, Washington, USA          108.61.194.105          16.8MB/s
    Softlayer, Seattle, USA         67.228.112.250          10.9MB/s
    Leaseweb, Washington, USA       207.244.94.80           6.16MB/s
    Vultr, Dallas, USA              108.61.224.175          19.4MB/s
    Linode, Dallas, USA             50.116.25.154           3.92MB/s
    Softlayer, Dallas, USA          173.192.68.18           11.1MB/s
    Leaseweb, Dallas, USA           209.58.153.1            6.38MB/s
    Vultr, Los Angeles, USA         108.61.219.200          16.2MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA          165.227.29.84           4.00MB/s
    DO, San Francisco, USA          107.170.223.15          14.4MB/s
    Linode, Fremont, USA            50.116.14.9             3.94MB/s
    Leaseweb, San Francisco, USA    209.58.135.187          4.13MB/s
    DO, Toronto, CA                 159.203.57.38           3.64MB/s
    OVH, Beauharnois, CA            192.99.19.165           2.90MB/s
    EastLink, Canada, CA            24.222.0.194            2.45MB/s
    Softlayer, Montreal, CA         169.54.124.180          6.42MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run) : 179 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run) : 494 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run) : 562 MB/s
    Average I/O speed  : 411.667 MB/s
    

    Thanks for the kind words boss. We all have our own things that makes us different in our own ways. Php friends offers great resources for the $ :)

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King

    CPU is indeed on weaker side for 4cores

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

Sign In or Register to comment.